Scam of the century

MORE than $60 billion in planned LNG investments are likely to be shelved because the Rudd Government's emissions trading scheme is "backwards" and penalises exports of the clean gas, according to Woodside Petroleum chief Don Voelte.
Asked what he intended to do about the problem, Mr Voelte said: "We have booked a lot of plane tickets to Canberra."
Good luck - it's always hard to get zealots to see reason. QANTAS is expected to announce today that it will axe between 2000 and 3000 jobs and cut more routes as it restructures to cope with high fuel prices. Get used to it. Not because the price of fuel will go up due to supply but because the Government are under pressure to raise the price to comply with it's global warming lie. From David Evans in todays Australian I DEVOTED six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office. I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia's compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in the land use change and forestry sector.
But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming. As Lord Keynes famously said, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"
You elected them now wear it. The country is being held to ransom by a bunch of alarmists and where are the Liberals in our moment of danger - can't hear 'em. Surely they should be questioning the basic tenet that says mere humans having more impact on global climate that the sun. We need someone with sufficient testosterone and wit to start educating the public. Tabloid TV, SBS and the ABC have rolled over and we can't view a scene of nature or animals cavorting without a sombre voice-over mentioning global warming. Films of icebergs melting, as they do very summer, cannot be shown without a mention of the impending doom for all mankind, Polar bears and penguins. All of this is based on shaky evidence that theorizes that we humans are causing these calamities. God forbid that the Sun should have some part to play. The trouble is, you can't make a religion out of the sun being to blame when it is just a part of a natural cycle. It needs to be caused by mankind so that the High Priests can agitate for change - force those filthy capitalists, petrol consuming V8 4WD owners (me) and other non-believers to see the light and convert. Evans again;
In the minds of the audience, the evidence that global warming has occurred becomes conflated with the alleged cause, and the audience hasn't noticed that the cause was merely asserted, not proved.
and;
Evidence consists of observations made by someone at some time that supports the idea that carbon emissions cause global warming. Computer models and theoretical calculations are not evidence, they are just theory.
...they are just theory has been my point since Stern's IPCC report and yet we are about to commit effort, money, profits, jobs and livelihoods on the alter of a false God. It would be OK if we spent money on R & D for alternative energy, forced companies to clean up their act and individuals to think smarter but to arbitrarily force big business to pay for carbon produced seems pointless. What happens to that income? Is it given back to the poor to compensate for price increases and if so what have we achieved. Rudd, Swan Song and Princess Penny say with all of their interfering with our economy, the impact on inflation will only be in the order of .09%. Well, excuse me, they would say that wouldn't they? Go back to first line of this post to see how believable any estimation of the impact on inflation will be.

3 comments

  • Because Rudd is about to release an un-guided wrecking into our economy he must provide hard observational evidence that proves the theory carbon dioxide released by human activities is a major cause of climate change.

    If he can’t produce this data we have every right to believe his assertion that carbon dioxide is to blame for “dangerous climate change” and that carbon is a “pollutant” is dishonest and to widely question every one of his government’s statements on climate change.

  • Whoops – it was supposed to read:

    Because Rudd is about to release an un-guided wrecking ball into our economy he must provide hard observational evidence that proves the theory carbon dioxide released by human activities is a major cause of climate change.

    If he can’t produce this data we have every right to believe his assertion that carbon dioxide is to blame for “dangerous climate change” and that carbon is a “pollutant” is dishonest and to widely question every one of his government’s statements on climate change.

    I left out the ‘ball’

  • It’s OK Peter – whoever constructed Dear Leader Kevni, also forgot his.