A minutes silence

It’s been two weeks since Nguyen Tuong Van met his maker on the road to drug trafficking riches and he is mostly gone and forgotten. What hasn’t been forgotten is the reaction of some to his death. Some 4,000 people attended his funeral in Melbourne, a city that had previously denied a digger the right to having his casket covered with the Australian flag and in Brisbane, the Premier, ordered a minutes silence in the House to mark his demise. This act alone inflamed the sensitivities of all of us who consider a minutes silence as a mark of respect for those who have died in the service of their country or community or have been the victims of terrorist obscenities such as Bali. In noway should it ever become a political statement as was Beatties call. I have reproduced two letters to Beattie, one from the Persident of the Royal Australian Regiment Association (Qld) and one from the President of the Qld RSL. I have deliberately delayed the posting of these letters to allow time for receipt and answer by Premier Beattie. We wait in vain.
6 December, 2005 Premier Beattie, Your decision to have the Queensland Parliament observe a minute silence in remembrance of Nguyen Tuong Van is considered offensive, disrespectful and an insult to Australian veterans and Australian families who have lost loved ones in service to Australia and in natural and man made disasters. The Royal Australian Regiment Association (Qld), the largest Army Association in the State, is appalled at your decision. It unanimously directed me to express their disgust to you. Never before have I seen such solidarity of the ex-service community with any one issue. By your act, under the explanation as “a mark of respect for the sanctity of human life� you have successfully alienated yourself and your Government from the services community. Most people do respect the sanctity of human life and choose to display that in a private and personal way. We will not let you demean the tribute principle of a minutes silence as a mark of respect for those who gave their lives in the service of their country or were victims of natural or man made disasters, by linking it to any convicted criminal. Duty First Lieutenant Colonel Ted Chitham MC (Retd) President
Naturally enough, as of Friday, the letter from the President remains unanswered.
6 December 2005 The Hon Peter Beattie MP Premier of Queensland PO Box 15185 City East QLD 4002 Dear Mr Premier I write on behalf of the Returned & Services League of Australia (Queensland Branch) members in regards to the minuteÂ’s silence that was observed in Queensland Parliament on Friday 2 December on the occasion of the execution of Nguyen Tuong Van. The RSL was deeply offended and strongly opposed to the Parliamentary move to recognise this event through a one-minute silence and we are extremely disappointed in your leadership in this matter. Our vehement opposition is rooted in the apparent disregard for the concept of silence for remembrance of departed comrades, who have sacrificed their lives and health for the sake our nation. Our members strongly believe the decision to move the momentÂ’s silence showed a complete disregard for the origins of remembrance silence, which is attributed to Australian journalist and returned serviceman, Edward Honey. HoneyÂ’s appeal for five silent minutes of national remembrance in 1919 was the beginning of what he described as a “very sacred intercessionÂ….communion with the Glorious Dead who won us peace…” The concept of remembrance silence remains an essential feature of commemorative services and League functions to this day. No matter how small, members stand in silence for a brief interval to remember their departed comrades. The RSL believes it is totally inappropriate to start using the moment’s silence for any other circumstance. To do so otherwise, is offensive to our veterans, war widows, and all those who have lost loved ones in the service of our nation. The fact that Queensland Parliament publicly bestowed the same honour and mark of respect reserved for those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice, on one who has been convicted of a criminal offence, was insulting and disrespectful. Furthermore, as Chairman of the ANZAC Day Commemoration Committee (Queensland) Incorporated, we believe you have a responsibility to uphold the objects of the Association, specifically: – the recognition of the gallant courage displayed by the Australian sons and daughters in fighting for the preservation of liberty and civilisation; and – the commemoration of our fallen and the acknowlegement of the suffering of our wounded. We strongly urge you, as Premier of Queensland, to exercise more appropriate discretion in future to preserve the sanctity of the minuteÂ’s silence so it remains as it was intended to be – a very sacred intercession. Lest We Forget. Yours truly, GW Mason State President Returned & Services League of Australia (Queensland Branch)

6 comments

  • What a weak entry today…. Melbourne never refused a digger the chance to drap his coffin in the Aussie flag…. it was the uniting church…. why bother writing if your going to peddle lies ?

    Once again your hate bubbles to the surface….

  • OK Judy, It wasn’t the city itself but if it happened within one city or even one country then it reflects the contradictions and that was my point. I think your point is a semantic one but it’s yours to make. Are you defending Melbourne, the people who attended Nguyen’s memorial service or do you just generaly disagree with the point of my post…I’m not sure.
    Hate is too emotional a word to describe my feelings on the matter. Disappointment that a Premier would make a mockery of an almost century old tradition to make a political point would be more apt.

  • I think Judy has been channelling some of your other commenters. (IP check required)

    Judy, why bother commenting if you are just going to gell upset. Go read Webdiary, I’m sure you will be right at home with the perpetually outraged.

  • Kev you are spot on with this one, Peter Beattie is an idiot and you know I am a labor supporter too. Van Nguyen was a drug dealer puire and simple. People say “ooo he was just trying to get his brother out of debt” I say to that he must have known drug dealers here and in cambodiea in order to pull this off. Around my area the Vietnamese are the heroin dealers, there is a viet shop down the road and apparantly they used to sell heroin over the counter.

    Peter Beattie got it wrong again and should pay dearly for this, I am deeply ashamed of his actions.

  • Peter Beattie gets it wrong again! 1 min silence for a convicted drug dealer, what a joke!!!!!

  • This mark of respect is reserved for special people who do special
    things.
    For example, people who made the supreme sacrifice for their country.

    We believe this was an insult to all those people and their families,
    and all Queenslanders should remember this at the ballot box in the
    2007 election.