Terrorist next door

Brisbane could have it’s first brush with terrorism as police charge a man from the suburb of Aspley with terror offences. My youngest daughter lives at Aspley and it’s only a short drive from my place. A bit to close to home for my liking.
Police won’t rule out the possibility that four bombs – some embedded with nails and razor blades – and 10 detonators allegedly found at Amundsen’s Windrest Avenue home during a raid on Tuesday night were being stockpiled for a terrorist attack.
I’m obviously not privy to all the evidence but those words certainly smack of nefarious intent to me.
Police allege Amundsen, 40, used a fictitious name to buy 53kg of Powergel explosive from the Beenleigh branch of international company Orica, and had built 10 remote detonators, which were located in his Aspley home he shares with his elderly mother.
No, that doesn’t make me feel any more secure either. If he’s legit why the ficticious name?
Police sources said Amundsen had allegedly claimed he bought the explosives to blow up trees and to use in stunts for a movie he was making.
…embedded with nails and razor blades? Not exactly a Greenie and I’m sure the actors guild would take a dim view of razor blades and bolts in the explosives used for stunts they were working on. Outside of court Amundsen’s lawyer, Andrew Boe, lashed out at the media for reporting allegations his client was a terrorist.
He said there was a “completely plausible and non-nefarious explanation for the circumstances in which he finds himself” but would not elaborate.
“I refuse (to reveal) … the nature of the evidence, it would not be responsible of me to do so and certainly not responsible for the media to speculate simply because some allegations have been placed before the court,” Mr Boe said.
The media are only reporting what the police have stated and when they charge a man with terror offence surely it’s reasonable to say so. It will be interesting to see what develops.

Welfare vs work

Under the banner No Benefits to working Caroline Overington inadvertantly underlines one of our society’s problems.
An analysis by the Brotherhood of St Laurence found a sole parent of two school-age children who takes a 30-hour-a-week job at the minimum wage of $13 an hour would lose about 64per cent of their extra earnings. “This parent will also have to pay around $60 a week for childcare,” the Brotherhood’s executive director Tony Nicholson said.
“This leaves him or her approximately only $80 a week better off by working. They are effectively working for an hourly rate of $2.66. The Government has squibbed. People want to move from welfare to work but the budget doesn’t encourage it.”
That entire arguement justifies staying on welfare and ignores the values of work itself. The increasing self esteem and the resultant self confidencethat often leads to promotion or permanent work and the fact that receiving a wage is the entry key to superannuation
“This leaves him or her approximately only $80 a week better off by working. They are effectively working for an hourly rate of $2.66.”
Rubbish! They are working for a better life – the $2.66 figure will only frighten welfare recipients as they discuss their situation with others in the dole queue. They need to be encouragement, not sympathy.

Question for Bill Shorten

I like this post at Ambit Gambit so much I’m going to post it in full
Questions for Bill Shorten Bill, if belonging to a union is such a good idea why is it that you are only acting on safety problems at the Beaconsfield mine after they’ve proved fatal? Rather than just calling for an inquiry into the mine company’s management of the mine shouldn’t you be having a long hard look at your own operation? Maybe it’s time to allow alternative representatives to unions to handle industrial issues and admit that life’s been so cosy for the union movement for so long that they’ve stopped to offer a valuable service. But then, if John Howard and Alexander Downer can walk away from the AWB scandal unscathed, why should your situation be any different? It’s not as though it was your job to run the mine, just represent the interests of the workers, and if no-one directly told you that there were any problems, even though plenty of people apparently knew, then it couldn’t be your responsibility in any way…could it?

ACTU and Greenpeace confirm budget good for country

The ACTU President, Sharan Burrow has slammed tonights budget thus confirming, in my mind at least, that it’s good for the country.

On cue GREENPEACE also slammed (there sure is a lot of slamming going on) the Budget as failing once again to make any mention of climate change.

Greenpeace Australia campaigns manager Danny Kennedy said climate change was the most important environmental issue of our times.
Climate change is obviously the most important environmental issue in Danny’s times but thankfully the government is sticking to the old rule of not pandering to every whacko group in the country. THE Australian Industry Group says this year’s budget is good for business. Group chief executive Heather Ridout welcomed changes to superannuation which aim to encourage people to stay longer in the workforce but thinks the government should have spent more on infrastructure. I agree with her; even though the government has allocated 2.3 billion for infrastructure it is never enough.

Australian Democrats leader Lyn Allison says that by handing out tax cuts to all, the Government is simply trying to win votes in the lead-up to the next election.

“There’s not much here that’s about nation-building or for future generations,” she said.

I’m not an economist but putting $18 billion into the Future fund – which has been set up to cover unfunded public servants’ superannuation – as an initial payment and planning for about 140 billion by 2020 looks a bit like building for future generations to me.

And don’t forget the old “It’s not very equitable, we’re seeing the biggest tax cuts for the highest income earners” line. I’m not a mathmetician either but somewhere in my dim dark schooldays where I learnt maths on a slate I seem to recall that percentage cuts are firstly, the smartest way to deliver some taxes back to the people and secondly, will always be bigger for the bigger income earners. It’s about maths.

Lyn goes on throwing mud;

“We’re seeing the budget for defence and security outstripping education by $2 billion and that does say it all in terms of what the Government’s priorities are,” she said.

This despite an overall funding boost of $21.7 billion for the education, science and training sector.

The Federal Opposition is supporting the federal Budget’s tax cuts, saying the changes mirror those proposed by the Opposition. Or, we thought of it first and would’ve implimented the same cuts if……..

The ABC says “We think it’s fairly describable as our best Budget outcome in over 20 years.” Well thats what the chairman of the ABC, Donald McDonald says but Kerry and Tony will be hammering slamming it tomorrow night.

With my background I welcome any additional funding for national security as much as the Greens, the Democrats and other assorted whackos hate it. C-17 Aircraft (to carry the new tanks and much, much more) more money for more troops and more money for the troops with pay rises. More ASIO operators ($800 million) and about $500 million extra for border security. That should wind up the refugee activists.

The “My particular hobby horse/religion/group/activist mob/doomsayers/ didn’t get enough” mob will be out in force tomorrow and all lined up at the ABS and SBS but otherwise I think it’s a reasonable 11th budget for Costello.

Police Sergeant gunned down

More bad news from Tasmania

A POLICE officer is in a critical condition in hospital after being shot in the back three times when he stopped a motorist on a highway north of Hobart.

Tasmania Police said Sergeant Les Cooper had pulled over the motorist on the Midland Highway 1km north of Pontville, about 11am (AEST) today, after he noticed the car was being driven erratically.
The officer was shot at least three times in the back with what was believed to be a .22-calibre handgun.
The Police have got the bastard that did it and it only remains for the Judge to slap his wrist and let him go. That’s what happens isn’t it?

Richard Carlton dies mid attack

60 Minutes Richard Carlton’s last words
“On 26th October last year, not 10 metres from where these men are now entombed, you had a 400-tonne rock fall. Why is it, is it the strength of the seam, or the wealth of the seam, that you continue to send men into work in such a dangerous environment?”
Typically Carlton was trying to pin the blame for the disaster in the mining company,  but let’s face it they continue to send men into work in such dangerous environments because they are miners and the company’s business is mining. Left wing shock journalism will never be the same. I won’t miss him but I’m sure his family and fans will be devastated and I feel sorry for them……well Ok…. I feel sorry for his family.

Beaconsfield Miners

According to the media the rescue of the two miners seems to be more about Shorten and his push for a seat and Eddie McGuire and Channel Nine’s ratings than an actual rescue. Channel Seven are in there fighting and six figure sums are being pencilled in media checque book stubs while Peter Meaking adopts the seldom held moral position (by the media at least) and suggests;
it was “tacky in the extreme” for The Age to try to measure one interview against another, he said. “To put a price on their salvation I reckon is pretty tacky.”
when The Age mentions how much Wood was paid for interviews after being released from captivity in Iraq. Woods got $400k and I can see how Meaking and McGuire would rather start the bidding at $250k. Yep, you’re right, I don’t like chequebook journalism. Me, I think it’s all about two guys who have gone through hell with a view of heaven through a small apperture. My thoughts go out to the family of the third miner, Larry Knight, who is hardly mentioned by the talking heads of commercial TV, and who only got to see as far as hell. Hang in there guys and enjoy your rebirth when your mates finally drill through.

Fish Fatwa

MEMRI TV quotes from an interview with Saudi cleric Dr Nasser bin Suleiman Al-‘Omar on Al Jazeera.

By Allah, a number of Iraqi religious scholars came to me, and said: “We have a problem.” What was the problem? They said: There have been so many American casualties that they loaded them on trucks and threw them away in the desert. But because the number of casualties was so high… The Iraqi scholars were asking me for a fatwa. They asked me to issue a fatwa on the following question: “Because there were so many casualties, the Americans began to throw them into the Tigris and the Euphrates. The fish have eaten from the flesh of the American and have gotten fat. Are we permitted to eat these fish or not?” Yes. This is the truth, brothers.

Clearly this guy is a graduate of the Robert Fisk School of Journalism

From reader HRT

Let him be

Private Kovko has been placed under a media microscope with too many of those peering through the lens only seeing their own prejudices. I have watched with amazement as a media circus lays the blame for his death and subsequent misplacement/missidentification at the feet of their enemies without a single solitary fact being considered. I’m further amazed at the dignitary list for his funeral with Prime Minister John Howard, Defence Minister Brendan Nelson, Defence Force chief Angus Houston, Army chief Peter Leahy and officers from 3RAR. I personally think military funerals for soldiers should be restricted to family; both geneological and military with politicians best kept away least the event turns into a media circus. It’s a private and personal moment. During the Vietnam war the home battalions conducted funerals for the away battalion resulting in my being well versed in the procedure. Having acted as the Sergeant in charge of many funeral parties I can only conclude that what I saw on TV last night was a military funeral for a general….times change. My reading of the cause of his death was a single gunshot wound to the head administered while he was alone and until an inquirey is completed no amount of speculation will clarify the situation. Readers commenting throughout the blog world have gone as far as to lay out in military fashion the laid down procedures for clearing a 9mm Browning pistol with asides like ‘professional soldiers don’t have UDs’ (army talk for accidental discharge); ‘it’s impossible to accidentaly kill yourself with a 9mm pistol‘ and ‘if you do it properly you will not have an UD’ that all seem to ignore the reality of war. When on operations Infantrymen suffer from sleep deprivation working anything up to 20 hours in any one day all of it under some sort of pressure. This leads to errors of judgement and weapon handling. It also leads to over-familiarity with weapons and all of this leads to accidental death. It happens. A comment at Tim Balir’s site sums it up well.
No one can even guess what happened to this man. There are too many contradictory stories, and the people telling them may have reasons to obfuscate. No matter what the facts are, they have now been buried under everyone elses agenda. The actual man, and his actual family, are no longer any consideration. Those poor people. My condolences to them, and my condolences to those Aussies who are saddened to lose one of their protectors. No matter how he died, he died in a foreign country, doing the dangerous things that we sent him to do. Let the man rest in peace, he has earnt it and leave his family alone, they need time to heal.
1 8 9 10 11 12 36