Combat Pay

A small article in the Courier Mail highlights combat pay rates for Aussies overseas (no link)
The federal Government will review the pay and conditions of Commandos serving in Afghanistan who are paid $28,000 less a year than their SAS comrades. Their skill levels are about 90% of those of an SAS soldier but they are paid a Special Operation Allowance of only #12,880 a year or $247 a week. SAS troops receive a Special Actions Forces Allowance of $40,979 a year of $788 a week.
Travel overseas for free, get given uniforms and a huge range of Ultimate Boy’s Toys to play with and then meet lots of interesting people and get to shoot at some of them. Tons of fun plus receive an allowance of near $800 a week over and above your salary all with serious tax concessions. Great job…can’t understand why recruiting is down. As an historical point, I seem to recall everyone in Vietnam got the same combat pay although base pay rates varied and that combat pay would buy 4 packets of cigarettes a week in todays shops. And for those readers who never understand when I’m being flippant, they all deserve every penny they get….I’m just jealous. I wonder what our allies are getting? Does any reader know?

The Pigs live again

My Vietnam almer mata was the 7th Battalion, The Royal Australian Regiment (7RAR) (could media types note the correct nomenclature) and whereas yesterdays’ announcement by the PM that we are upgrading the Army by 2, 600 men, mostly infantry, will be discussed long and hard by the media and a host of  professorial type armchair warriors, I and a host of my Vietnam era mates will only take one message from John Howard’s announcement. 7RAR live again to fight the foes of civilization.  7RAR has a proud history of Vietnam service and I just know that the younger generation will meet with the high expectations of us old soldiers. The Pigs?  No we were not unhiegenic (although we might have been on the nose a tad after a four week patrol in the jungle).  The story of our mascot goes back to 1965 when the battalion was first formed at Puckapunyal.  The newly appointed Commanding Officer (CO) thought he would have a look at his command and went up to Puckapunyal on a weekend ….unanounced …sneaky bugger, to check them out.  The few soldiers who had gathered as the nucleus of the battalion had been in the habit of spending most of their weekend in the boozer and this weekend was no different.  There were few NCOs or officers posted in too date and the boozer was a mess of beer cans.  On parade the next morning the CO called them a bunch of pigs to be answered by a loud retort of oink..oink from the back row. For a long time the Generals and the Colonels fought the idea of a pig as a mascot which guaranteed it’s longevity.  Today it is on our banners, stationery and badges and will be around as long as history holds our attention. I’ll make a bet right now that when the new 7RAR is formed and has it’s first parade, some old grey haired or bald ex digger will be there with a pig in attendance, a real one, to remind the young ones of their traditions. Are you reading this Dave W? UPDATE:  The Battalion was first formed on the 1st of September, 1965 so next week, Friday, is our 41st birthday.  I wonder if the Army and/or Politicians have a sense of history and are considering releasing the official documentation to split 5/7RAR on the same day? It would be historically tidy.

Long Tan

I never thought I’d live to see the day. In todays Australian the Vietnamese have admitted Australia won the Battle of Long Tan. With several hundred Vietnamese versus 18 Australians dead; with the fact neither the North Vietnamese Army nor the local Viet Cong never ever engaged Australians in major battles after that day and with their plan to annhilate the Australian Task Force by attacking the base with a 2,500 man regiment stopped dead by 108 Aussie infantrymen from Delta Coy, 6RAR; one wonders why anyone could ever think differently. But communists do think differently. As I recall at the time the communist forces claimed they had wiped out an Infantry battalion, 21 tanks (there were none at the battle) and as an aside, had sunk HMAS Sydney (for the fourth reported time) “For 40 years they have lied about Long Tan,” said former platoon commander Dave Sabben, as he stood at the spot where he and his troops repulsed Vietnamese soldiers. “They have never conceded they had their arses licked. [I’m sure Dave would’ve said ‘kicked’] Instead, they lied to their own people about what happened here. I find it offensive.” Now, 40 years on, Sabben and Buick – who commanded Australian troops during the battle – have returned to Long Tan, east of Ho Chi Minh City,[they mean Saigon] for a final showdown with the enemy.
The two Australians greeted their Vietnamese counterparts with warm handshakes in the plantation, near the memorial cross to the 18 Australians who died in the battle. After some small talk, the crucial question was posed to the Vietcong commanders: who won the battle of Long Tan? Nguyen Minh Ninh, former vice-commander of Vietcong D445 Battalion, thought carefully before answering – and then dropped a bombshell that exploded 40 years of official history. “You won … tactically and militarily, you won,” he said. His answer stunned Buick and Sabben. It was the first time a Vietnamese commander had ever admitted the truth about Long Tan.
The photographer claims the picture of Bob Buick, long time mate, and the ex 2IC of D445 Battalion, was taken at the site of the battle. With nary a rubber tree in sight and with pavers down on the ground I would suggest the pic was taken at Xa Long Tan, the village, not the battle site. I was at the site less than two years ago and it is well into the rubber plantation. I well remember seeing vague fleeting images of rubber tappers moving though the trees invoking bad memories. In 2004 I went back to Vietnam and visited the site at Long Tan. I wasn’t at the battle but the scene is now a ‘must do’ for Vietnam Veterans. As an infantryman with some experience I tried to explain how the soldiers would have felt;
We gaze at the cross deep in thought and I try to think of words to describe the events and feelings on that day. It’s not easy. Sometimes thoughts and feelings don’t translate easily into words. But try and imagine this. You are walking alone in the bush and someone fires a rifle towards you. You hear the crack-thump associated with close shots and you feel targeted and frightened. The rifle round makes a loud noise that startles you. Now put yourself in D Company’s shoes and try and imagine a couple of hundred people firing multiple rounds all seemingly targeting yourself. The noise is incomparable. There is no similar noise effect anywhere in the world that simulates hundreds of auto rounds coming towards you. While this crescendo tears apart your senses, friends are dying around you. The noise continues for hours, you are running out of ammo, you know the RAAF will have trouble resupplying due to the torrential rain and the talk amongst you is that this is it. You know that half the platoon is dead or wounded- the screaming is always a give away. You can see you are being attacked by assualt forces numbering in the hundreds and you only have maybe fifteen fit soldiers still able to fight. So what do you do. Run? Roll over and adopt the feotal crouch? Just lay there and scream for your mother or father? No. You make a stand and fight. It’s the difference. It’s what good training sets you for. It’s the essence of being a ‘Digger’ There are only two memorials to foreign armies in Vietnam. One at Dien Bien Phu where the French threw tactics out of the window and paid for it and the other is at Long Tan where D Coy held the thin green line and by doing so wrote themselves into history books.
My full report of that trip is here If I was amazed to read the Vietnamese had finally acknowledged D Coy kicked their arse at Long Tan, I was stunned to read in the Australian editorial that it was their considered opinion that our presence in Vietnam has been vindicated.
It has been more than 30 years since the fall of Saigon. Although this newspaper opposed the war in hindsight, the history of Vietnam under communist rule seems to vindicate the effort. Ho Chi Minh’s Stalinist regime was monstrous, even as it was lionised in the West. Vietnam still struggles under political and economic repression. But by stemming the totalitarian tide that was sweeping southeast Asia at the time, Australian and US troops may have saved countless millions.
Thirty eight years ago, I, as an army NCO was well aware that all Stalinist regimes were monstrous and that if anything, Ho Chi Minh’s regime would be worse – the Australian finally gets the picture and agrees publically. Maybe, just maybe all those never-to-be-forgotten friends didn’t die in vain. The left of course will always see things differently which happens when you live in a country, Australia, and believe in the wonder of communism and hoping and working for the defeat of your own troops. It is to these people that I address the following: It is a myth that the Free World Military Forces lost the Vietnam War. Called the American War by the Vietnamese the Communists lost at Tet 68 when they had their arses handed back to them on a plate. The South Vietnamese rebellion that the North had banked their money on didn’t eventuate and when Nixon released the dogs of war in the form of B52s a year or two later, they were forced to the Peace Talks in Paris. Agreement was reached, all beligerants withdrew; the US and Australia went home and the North Vietnamese pulled back north of the DMZ. The war was over. Two years later the North Vietnamese, rearmed by the USSR who wanted warm ports on the Pacific rim, invaded the South. That was the tragedy that was Vietnam. Millions were subject to execution and/or retraining camps and those Southerners who could, escaped by ship, by boat, almost by air mattress if that’s all they could find. Thousands more died on the seas but they considered that risk better than living under Ho Chi Minh. Anything would be better than that.

Aussie VC sets record at Auction

AUSTRALIA’S last privately owned Victoria Cross medal awarded at Gallipoli sold at auction tonight in Sydney, setting a world record price of $1 million.

The medal was purchased by a prominent philanthropic Australian businessman who wished to remain anonymous and who bid over the phone. Lot 1078 included seven other medals with a combined value of less than $100,000. The $1 million price tag breaks the record of $595,000 set in 2005 for a medal won by captain Thomas Hardy at Lord Nelson’s victory at Trafalgar in 1805.
The medal was awarded to Captain Alfred Shout who was born a KIWI but trained by the AIF! He was awarded a Military Cross for his courage and leadership at the landing at Gallipoli and won the VC later at Lone Pine further up the ridges. Just being present and soldiering on at Gallipoli took a special type of courage.

Kovco’s magic pistol

From this report on the the Kovco Inquiry comes this strange statement. At least it appears strange to this old infantryman and one-time captain of the Battalion Pistol Shooting team (undefeated Lavarack Barracks 1982)
The board had previously heard that Kovco’s gun had passed a series of tests proving it was unlikely to fire accidentally. The fact that the bullet’s cartridge case was trapped in the gun’s mechanism also suggested it had been fired by Kovco himself, the board was told, as his subsequently slack grip on the weapon would have obstructed its normal operation.
The normal operation of a weapon, in this case it’s reload mechanism, is initiated by the firing of the round producing gases and pressure that unlock and drive the bolt rearward from whence it rebounds and picks up another round from the in-handle grip magazine, loads it in the breech and locks for another shot. This process is extremely fast and is not dependant on the firer having a firm grip. Once a round is fired it just happens and in Kovco’s case the pistol would have reloaded before it fell from his hand unless there were other factors involved. Where was it trapped in the pistol’s mechanism? In the breech or had it only half ejected? Maybe I’m being a bit technical but statements like that would have me asking questions. Maybe the journalist just reports what he thinks is relevant and missed out on telling us relevant facts that would explain; but as given, I don’t accept that part of the evidence as reliable. Any RAEME armourers care to comment?

Breaking News

At this very moment, 14:00 EST, a RAAF F111 is attempting to land at RAAF Amberly without the advantage of wheels. It has just aborted one attempt and is currently circling for another approach.

I can only wish the pilots a steady hand and sharp eye.

Hope the pilot doesn’t scratch the plane – we need them

UPDATE:

BuckshotColt2 has just executed a perfect belly landing. I suspect the pilot arrived on the tarmac with only a few litres of fuel on board as he was circling for sometime burning it off. Channel Nine had a chopper and live video feed from 15 Km out to avoid restricted airspace and showed the F111 only taking about a hundred yards of tarmac before coming to an undignified halt. There was some spark and flame from friction and other factors but the flames died as quickly as the two crew evacuated the aircraft – about 2 seconds.

Look for the film on CH 9 news tonight. They will play it for all it’s worth and wait for Beasley et al to blame it on Howard. By 7:00pm the ABC will have had plenty of time to arrange comment, maybe ABC reporter and Senator Bob Brown could get another gig. He’d be happy to put an anti government spin on some poor jet jockey’s bad afternoon.

Either way, it is a good end for a potential disaster; the F111 doesn’t even look dented but of course there will be damage and I would imagine it will have to be virtually rebuilt before flying again.

UPDATE: Reader Kaos leaves a link to the video in comments. I have moved it here to avoid a three-monitor wide link.

Pte Kovco II

More from the Kovco Inquiry

Jake Kovco’s mates have a preminition about the body mix up

An unnamed soldier, codenamed Soldier 14, told the inquiry into Pte Kovco’s death and bungled repatriation that a group of fellow soldiers had tried to prevent any mix-up involving his body.

“We were looking after Jake and we wanted to make sure the job was done,” Soldier 14 told the inquiry in Sydney, via a video link from Baghdad. “Our job was to make sure he got home and I guess we wanted to make sure that it was him that went home and that’s why we, as a group, had talked about that. “One member then put forward that statement to Soldier 2, to make sure that it was him (Pte Kovco) because stranger things have happened.”
In all my days I have never heard of a body mixup other than on this one occassion. I wonder what historical precedence these guys used to express the concern that there might be a problem. It sounds like invention after the fact to me but then maybe it’s a known in-theatre problem. It’s hard to be sure from my desk in Brisbane. In another article Soldier 17, a 23-year-old private figures it was an accident
….yesterday told the inquiry he believed Pte Kovco could have been shot in the head while joking around with his two roommates.
And this………
Soldier 14 told the Sydney inquiry that Pte Kovco walked several metres in front of him as they were leaving their posts and then held a door closed on him at a weapons checkpoint so he could not get through. At the time, Soldier 14 said he decided he would clear his own rifle because he did not have Pte Kovco to follow the so-called “buddy system” of checking each other’s weapons when their duty finished. Soldier 14 said Pte Kovco had been carrying a rifle plus his 9mm Browning pistol on duty that day.
……raises the question; what were the NCO’s and Officers doing while all this horseplay was going on. The so called “Buddy System” aside, where soldiers check that each others weapons are cleared, surely the Corporal Section Commander has a responsibility to at least ensure this happens. The Inquiry now enters a phase of reviewing classified evidence in camera and fair enough too. It’s bad enough we have to wash our dirty linen in public without journalists and unqualified commentators debating operational security matters involving our troops in Iraq.

Curiouser and coriouser

According to this report Pte Kovco dreamt of death by his own hand just one month before he died from a single gun shot wound to the head. I find it alarming that he not only had such a dream but he then recorded it in his private diary the next morning. Physciatrists would have a field day in a court case if armed with such startling information. I am further alarmed by the statements of the two soldiers with him at the time who are reported as saying;
The three men had been singing along to pop music, reminiscing and using laptop computers when Pte Kovco’s gun suddenly discharged just 5cm away from his head around 4pm. Pte Kovco’s pistol was in a holster slung on the bed post of his bunkbed, while he stood on the ground typing an email to his wife using a laptop perched on the top mattress.
I have been an Investigating Officer in the Army and know more than most punters about weapon handling, mishandling and the associated stories rationalizing same. I’m not saying it can’t happen, I’m just saying I have never heard of anything like it happening and therefore think a strong case exists to doubt the veracity of the evidence given too date…or, put more simply, someone is telling lies. If the pistol hadn’t had the trigger guard removed it would be virtually impossible for it to discharge whilst still in the holster. The trigger guards very reason for existance is to stop accidental discharges and for that reason is seldom removed.The SASR have been known to do so for improved reaction time but I have never heard of infantry troops doing it. I could be wrong but even if I am, we still have to move the muzzle of the weapon from the bedpost to 5 centimetres away from Pte Kovco’s head. I placed my laptop on my bed just now and adopted a typing position; this put my head more than 30 centimetres away from any bedpost. It’s too early to draw any conclussions other than, up to this point, the testimony given has some serious holes in it. If reported accurately the Investigating Officer must be doing some serious eye-rolling. “One of the them said `I didn’t hear the weapon cock nor did I see the weapon in his hand.” I would be beside myself in haste to ask; “then where was the pistol immediately after you heard the shot? In the holster, on the bed or on the floor? The answer to this would clear up some doubt. I presume the question was raised. The inquiry is expected to hear more evidence from Baghdad this week before adjourning until mid-July. Via Rick in comments.
1 12 13 14 15 16 21