A new ALP or is it?

NEW Labor leader Kevin Rudd today told voters to give his office a call and share their ideas on how his party should develop policies that offer a clear alternative to the Howard Government.

Do you mean to say he has got this far and doesn’t have a clear set of policies?

I’m not a Rudd fan for the same reason I don’t like my wife when she nags excessively nor my old teachers when they ticked me off too much. I have only heard him harp about Howards policies; never about his own vision for the future and I definitely don’t like the handbag on his left arm; Gillard.

She holds Jim Cairns dear and quotes him in a speech she gave to Melbourne High School students as she extolls the virtues of peace activism, supporting the Soviets and anarchy.

Rudd may not be a loose cannon like Latham but the ropes holding him down are frayed and the ship’s sailing though a heavy swell. With Gillard as navigator there will too much of a risk that the party will keep on veering to port and I for one wouldn’t like Australia going down that road again.

A softer shade of Cairns as Whitlam’s deputy and what has Rudd promised in return for the support of the left?

I liked Beazley and he definitely has my commisserations for the very bad day he had. I also think there is a smattering of talent in the ALP but it remains to be seen whether Rudd will be able to pick and choose his own front bench nothwithstanding his demand for that very right.

Mr Rudd, who had an emphatic victory in yesterday’s caucus ballot, is now under pressure to promote backers into senior front bench roles.

Of course he is.

The ALP are in a better position than they were when they opted for the lunatic Latham to lead but I don’t think it’s enough for a ground swell against Howard.

The ALP can attack IR laws all they like but untill they come up with a better policy that includes a guarantee of keeping unemployment down it won’t wash with the electorate. The AWB Cole Commission was a fizzer for those hoping it would bring down Howard and yet that’s all I’m hearing – nag, nag, nag!

Time will tell if new leadership will mean much but I’m betting it won’t be enough to cross the divide.

It’s on!

Kevin ‘Tricky’ Rudd has thrown his hat in the ring as Kim Beazley gives in to pressure and declares a spill of his entire frontbench.

Mr Beazley today declared a spill of his entire frontbench following a fortnight of pressure for him to stand aside in favour of Labor’s foreign affairs spokesman Kevin Rudd.

It just keeps on getting better

Labor’s health spokeswoman Julia Gillard will make a statement on the leadership spill later today, her spokeswoman said.

Ms Gillard, the member for Lalor in Victoria, has been mooted as a possible leader or deputy leader.

In the past she was endorsed for the leadership position by former leader Mark Latham.

Personal endorsement by Latham…mmm that should help.

With ‘Tricky’ Rudds carping voice and Julia’s left wing antics it bodes well for us conservatives in 2007.

I can see more clearly now

When posting on Peter Tinley the other day I resisted the temptation to ask when he was going to nominate for federal parliament although I did say that if ex Army Officers critisize the government of the day they should do so quoting their political aspirations rather than their military qualifications. I was so sure he was an ALP member I even googled his name looking for an association but couldn’t find any. I obviously need better intelligence that would allow me to follow up a persons obvious political leanings – is there a list of party members anywhere on the net? Todays press announces Peter’s intention to seek preselection for the crucial marginal seat of Stirling in Western Australia for the ALP and in fact mentions he joined the Fremantle branch of the ALP in 2001. He should’ve resigned his commission then as the army officers code holds us to being apoliticial – can’t do the job otherwise. Why is none of this a surprise?
He also claims to have been traumatised by his deployment to the MV Tampa which happened just after his joining the ALP He was scathing about that “frightful” experience yesterday, saying it played a big part in his political awakening. “We were effectively invading the sovereign soil of Norway … the Government was using us as a political tool,” he said.
Yeah, right and what sort of mission brief did he give his troopers for that deployment? A more honest headline in the Saturday’s Weekend Australian might have read ALP member with left wing tendencies says Iraq is a blunder and buried in the article could’ve been a mention of his military background. That way it wouldn’t have been so embarrassing to the Corps.

Some musician blasts PM over aid budget

IRISH rock star Bono has praised John Howard’s management of the domestic economy, but accused him of taking Australia to the bottom of the global league in engagement with the world’s poor.
“What kind of Australia do you want to live in? You’ve got this incredible prosperity – I’ve been coming here for 20 years and I’m in awe of what you have done,” Bono said. But John Howard “has also led your country to the bottom of the league table in terms of engagement with the world’s poor, and I don’t think that’s an Australia people want to live in.”
I guess the Irish musician’s point is we are not allocating foreign aide as he would like. A long time proponent of reinforcing failure by pooring money into African despot’s bank accounts has him ignoring the good we do manage with foreign aid. I’m quiet happy for our foreign aid to be spent in our neighbourhood. We can’t fix every problem in the world but we can impact on the Pacific and as we do we can insist on aid going to the needy. I’m of the opinion that some of the flack we are currently getting from Pacific island leaders is because we are insisting on accountability. I’m also of the opinion that of we allocate more funds elswhere, to the UN or other agencies, then our ability to see the funds spent where they are most needed is hampered. According to one link I’ve found, Foreign Policy, where rich countries are assessed over seven policy areas; Australia is doing her fair share and is certainly performing better that some of the big players. This Commitment to Development Index (CDI) deems our contribution more valuable that Ireland’s so maybe the Irish musician might like to address problems closer to home before he takes us to task. Stick to singing Bozo Bono. UPDATE:  Further reading of the Weekend Australian reveals a review by Patricia Anderson of a book titled “The Triumph of the airheads and the Retreat of Common Sense” by Shelley Gare.  Contained within the review is this observation;
Gare scorns a pheonomenon that, anthropologically speaking, is quiet recent.  This the movie star, a physically appealing individual whose job it is to pretend to be someone else. This has given rise to a certain omnipotence among some who confuse themselves with their parts.  Thus we have to endure stars who think they are poets or intellectuals giving us their views on politics, ethics and religion across obscene page space given by the editors.
I would include musicians in that observation.

Change course, Bush urged from all sides

US President George W.Bush left Washington yesterday bound for the Asian economic summit in Vietnam with advice from left, right and centre ringing in his ears to change course, not only in Iraq but on foreign policy in general. Good Idea. Start with securing the borders of Iraq and then attacking the terrorists lines of supply and if that means destroying the factories from whence they obtain their explosives for IEDs then so be it. In whatever country they are located. The anti-war terrorist appeasement brigade have achieved one of their aims. They can now draw parrallels between Vietnam and Iraq with some degree of truth after the mid-term US elections. In ’72 and ’74 when the South Vietnamese needed support the then Democrat majority denied them hope allowing the Communist North to re-arm courtesy of the USSR and subsequently invade South Vietnam. The assassinations, reducation camps and communists policies resulting in poverty and terror for the remaining millions who couldn’t flee is now history. I would just hope we don’t repeat history just because we have forgotten the past or never understood it in the first place.

US Mid-term elections

Senator Kerry campaigns for the Republicans as he reminds the US that the Democrats come with left wing garbage.
Senator Kerry is a decorated war veteran who served in Vietnam. He said people were “crazy” to think he would denigrate America’s 140,000 personnel serving in Iraq.
Maybe people are crazy and are ready to believe that Kerry would insult servicemen because that’s what he does. Since he first come on the radar screen in the early 70s his stock and trade has been to dispage his own countrymen and curry favour with their enemies. Kerry in 2006 addressing a rally;
You know, education–if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.
Kerry in 1971 addressing a Senate Inquiry;
They [US servicemen in Vietnam] had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.
But as we know, Kerry is also a a man of action. He went to North Vietnam and helped the communists secure leverage in the Paris Peace Talks. This from a guest at the Hanoi Hilton during the Vietnam war;
I was a POW for nearly six years, held in North Vietnam prison camps, including the notorious Hanoi Hilton, a place of unimaginable horrors — torture, beatings, starvation and mind-numbing isolation. When Kerry branded us “war criminals,” he handed our captors all the justification they needed to carry out their threats to execute us. Thanks to Kerry, Jane Fonda and their comrades in the anti-war movement, our captivity was prolonged by years. The communists in Hanoi and Moscow couldn’t have had a better press agent to spread their anti-American propaganda.
And this from Opinion Journal;
Kerry’s apology isn’t really an apology at all. Here’s a shorter summary of it:
1. What I said wasn’t really what I said. 2. I’m sorry if you misinterpreted what I was saying by taking it at face value. 3. Republicans suck.
Why it is so hard just to say, “I’m sorry for what I said”? I trust we can get quotes from Kerry everyday from now until the mid-term US elections. It may help to remind Americans that this is what the Democrats think of the US military. Every house has a veteran and the main-steam America treats them honourably, unlike Kerry.

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t

JOHN Howard’s new wage tribunal for low-income earners has been accused of lacking credibility by a prominent union official, who claims it granted higher pay rises than expected to help the Government at next year’s federal election. Bill Shorten, national secretary of the Australian Workers Union and a future Labor leadership contender, says the Fair Pay Commission would not have awarded a $27-a-week increase in the minimum wage last week without the forthcoming election. That presumes Howard has the power of veto over the Fair Pay Commission and I’m not sure if that’s the case. However it is good to have the AWU’s election tactic out in the open. If any result from the IR laws is at risk of being seen as positive for the workers then Shorten can claim it is a Coalition re-election tactic. Look, the unemployment figures are the best ever. Ah yes but it’s because of the forthcoming election. Look, workers have just got another pay rise and they’re so happy. Ah yes but it’s because of the forthcoming election. Not much threat to us conservatives in that ploy.

Beasley still doesn’t understand

LABOR has accused the Howard Government of breaking its promise over interest rates and says it is out of touch with the financial pressures confronting middle Australia.The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is widely expected to raise interest rates next month after annual inflation came in at 3.9 per cent this week. For a start “widely expected to raise” is not the same as “have raised” and Howard still has a long way to go before interest rates even approach those of the last Labor government. We would need something like a 400% rise to even get near them. Remember Beasley? Howard said Interest rates would be lower under his government than under Labor – not that they would never rise. For God’s sake man, stop inventing promises Howard never made and accusing him of breaking them.

Queenslands Attorney-General resigns

Linda Lavarch has resigned citing depression. Anyone would be depressed after a week of grilling in the house over decisions she made that were either stupid, politically naive or politically inept. She simply failed to come up with any rationale excuse for not doing a deal with Dr Patel Death’s lawyers to get him in court. If you are going to ignore DPP advice you need a good reason and the fact that the ALP didn’t want Patel in court during the lead up to the recent election doesn’t cut it. Couldn’t have the electorate being reminded every day about the government’s track record on health…could we? I wonder if Peter Beattie is reaching for the prozac yet or does he expect us to believe that a novice AG would be allowed to make a decision of this magnitude by herself.
“I was not aware of the written document – and that doesn’t make any difference. Can I tell you that the written DPP advice is irrelevant,” Mr Beattie said. 
Why is the DPP advice irrelevant. I would imagine that giving the government advise is one of their roles and if such advice is ignored, then I think it’s reasonable we know why. Still, as we all know the reason it was ignored then it only leaves a taste of the government thumbing their nose at the public. We know what’s best for you and we don’t neeed to explain. If ever a government was elected as the lesser of two evils…this one is it.

Scientists and magic numbers

Tim Lambert is a computer scientist at the University of New South Wales and a standout example of why we don’t let academics with math majors run real life situations. He has invested a considerable amount of time defending the latest Lancet Democrat Party campaign advert that points to 650,000 deaths in Iraq.

Using such cutting post titles as Flypaper for the ennumerates and Stupid beyond belief he attacks all and sundry with mathmatical wizardry pointing out the methodolgy is well proven. What he doesn’t do is prove that the figures are anywhere near believable.

As there are too many lawyers fighting battles in court to save the souls of terrorist with clever legal procedures against a backdrop of slaughtered civilian victims then likewise there are now too many scientist quoting theory that has little to do with real life.

When I went to war, as different than when I read about it or studied the mathmatical formulae pertaining to same; my battalion lost 30 killed and 220 wounded giving a 7.33:1 ratio of deaths to wounded. Our sister battalion lost 50 to 281 resulting in a ratio of 5.6:1. Current stats from Iraq are running at 8:1, slightly higher, but all this low level maths suggests the Iraq hospitals have had 5.2 million wounded to deal with. The 650,000 also suggests that there has been 500 killed per day for every day of the war.

Sorry, I just don’t believe it. As Lambert argues, the methodology is proven but the extrapolation says what might be and it clearly isn’t.

It is worth reading the comments at Deltoid. It may help the casual reader to understand the politics behind the anti Bush theorists. Theories abound in a common sense vacuum.

1 63 64 65 66 67 85